Report:
I just spoke with Marc Harmon in Sam Farr’s Washington office about the two issues on which everyone agreed were immediate concerns of all of us and required immediate action by Rep. Farr (just to ensure clarity, those were: 1.) cosponsor Rep. Kucinich’s House Res. 66; and, 2.) immediate action to implement UNSCR 1860). He told me:
- · He and Sam are working on cosponsoring this resolution, even though Marc’s “sense” is that this H. Res. will never get out of committee for a vote on the House floor (that would be very unfortunate). However, we agreed that since this H. Res. is a response to the Resolutions (S. Res. 10 and H. Res. 34) voted on in the Senate and House two weeks ago, it is important for that reason and is worthy of cosponsoring for that reason and others;
- · He also told me, regarding implementation of UNSCR 1860, that they are working on a letter to Secretary Clinton (have to get used to that) that is using information from a recent meeting with Andrew Whitley (Director, UNRWA Representative Office, N.Y.) that sounds like it was a status report on the conditions in Gaza and what types of aid were immediately required and the costs of such, etc. He is working on this letter with staff from other Rep’s. offices (including Barbara Lee’s) and we agreed that this is probably a very effective means of addressing our issue of implementing the UNSCR 1860. He is formalizing this letter with the other offices next week and we agreed that we will talk on Friday of next week and he will give me a copy of the letter at that time.
(Note: here is an explanation, for those who need such, for my comment above, "... this H. Res. is a response to the Resolutions (S. Res. 10 and H. Res. 34) voted on in the Senate and House two weeks ago ... and is worthy of cosponsoring for that reason." Every year members of the House and Senate submit Resolutions supporting Israel and denouncing Hamas, or Hezbollah, or whoever is the current "terrorist" harassing or attacking the state of Israel at the moment. These Resolutions, without exception, state Israel's right to exist "as a Jewish state" -- without any mention of the fact that this "Jewish state" was created on 95% Palestinian land and that most of the Palestinians who once lived on that land were dispossessed of that property and their homes -- and condemn whoever dares to oppose the state of Israel (or resist or defend themselves from its illegal military occupation, or illegal siege or embargo on its civilian population (Gaza), or any number of other violations of international law or human or civil rights, or acts of aggression, or dispossession of property, settler violence, acts of intimidation at roadblocks, oppression, torture of Palestinian journalists, extra-legal assassinations or imprisonments ... Have I missed anything? Of course. There is not enough room on this page -- even though it is virtually endless. Now, don't misunderstand these comments. I do not support the militant organizations within Hamas or Hezbollah -- although, if I were a Palestinian voter, I would probably support the political wing of Hamas, as the Palestinian voters did in January, 2006. What I am saying here is that one needs to consider all the facts and all the history going back to the Balfour Declaration and the Partition Plan of 1947, particularly, before one begins to judge or support anyone or their actions. And, if I may, I recommend, to start, a reasonably objective history of the period from 1947 to 1949, such as Benny Morris, "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited", Cambridge University Press, 2004.)

No comments:
Post a Comment